Qodo AI Pricing: Free vs Teams vs Enterprise Plans in 2026

Understanding Qodo’s Pricing Structure

Qodo, formerly known as CodiumAI, is the only AI code quality platform that combines PR review, test generation, IDE assistance, and CLI tooling in a single product. That breadth comes with a pricing model that is more layered than most competitors - a credit system for IDE and CLI usage, a separate PR review allocation, and three tiers that range from a genuinely useful free plan to custom enterprise pricing.

Understanding what you actually pay for Qodo - and whether that price makes sense compared to alternatives like CodeRabbit, GitHub Copilot, and CodeAnt AI - requires looking at both the Qodo Gen (IDE/CLI) and Qodo Merge (PR review) sides of the platform. This guide breaks down every pricing tier, explains the credit system, compares costs at different team sizes, and helps you decide which plan fits your team.

For a full feature review beyond pricing, see our Qodo review. If you are exploring alternatives, check our Qodo alternatives guide and Qodo vs GitHub Copilot comparison.

Qodo Products: Gen, Merge, and PR-Agent

Before diving into pricing, it helps to understand the three product layers that make up the Qodo platform.

Qodo Gen is the IDE and CLI assistant. It provides code completion, test generation, local code review, and AI chat inside VS Code and JetBrains IDEs. The CLI tool extends these capabilities to the terminal. Qodo Gen usage is metered through a credit system.

Qodo Merge is the hosted PR review service. When you open a pull request on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, or Azure DevOps, Qodo Merge’s multi-agent architecture analyzes the diff and posts inline review comments, PR summaries, and test suggestions. Qodo Merge usage is metered by the number of PR reviews per month.

PR-Agent is the open-source foundation of Qodo Merge. Teams can self-host PR-Agent on their own infrastructure using Docker, providing their own LLM API keys. The software is free. This is the zero-cost alternative for teams that have the DevOps capacity to manage their own deployment.

All three products are covered under the same Qodo subscription. Pricing tiers determine the limits for both Gen (credits) and Merge (PR reviews).

Plan-by-Plan Breakdown

Developer Plan (Free)

The free Developer plan is designed for individual developers and small teams evaluating the platform.

PR reviews: 30 per month per organization. This is a shared pool across the entire organization, not per user. If you have a 5-person team, all five developers draw from the same 30 review allocation.

IDE and CLI credits: 250 per month. Most standard LLM requests cost 1 credit. Premium models cost more - Claude Opus uses 5 credits per request and Grok 4 uses 4 credits per request. For a developer making 5-10 IDE interactions per day with standard models, 250 credits lasts roughly 25-50 working days - well over a month. Heavy users of premium models will burn through credits faster.

Features included: Full AI-powered PR code review with the same multi-agent architecture used on paid plans. IDE plugin for local code review and test generation. CLI tool for agentic quality workflows. Community support through GitHub.

What is missing: The free tier has no private support channel, no data retention guarantees, and limited PR and credit allocations. There is no access to the context engine for multi-repo awareness, enterprise dashboard, or SSO.

Who it works for: Solo developers, freelancers, open-source contributors, and teams of 2-3 developers who submit fewer than 30 PRs per month. It is also the right choice for any team evaluating Qodo before committing budget.

Teams Plan ($30/user/month)

The Teams plan is Qodo’s standard paid tier for professional development teams.

Pricing: $30 per user per month on annual billing. Monthly billing costs $38 per user per month, making annual billing 21% cheaper. For a 10-developer team, annual billing saves $960 per year.

PR reviews: Currently unlimited as a limited-time promotion. The standard allocation is 20 PRs per user per month. When the promotion ends, a 10-developer team would have a pool of 200 PR reviews per month. This is an important detail to confirm with Qodo’s sales team before committing, as the unlimited promotion may not be permanent.

IDE and CLI credits: 2,500 per user per month - a 10x increase over the free tier. This is generous enough for heavy daily usage, including some premium model requests. A developer making 20-30 IDE interactions per day with standard models would use roughly 400-600 credits per month, well within the allocation.

Additional features: Standard private support with no data retention, meaning Qodo does not store your source code after analysis. This is a meaningful privacy assurance for teams handling proprietary code.

Who it works for: Teams of 5-50 developers who need reliable PR review throughput, higher credit limits for IDE and CLI usage, and private support. The $30/user/month price point is competitive with alternatives when you factor in the bundled test generation and IDE tooling.

Enterprise Plan (Custom Pricing)

The Enterprise plan adds organizational controls, cross-repo intelligence, and flexible deployment options.

Pricing: Custom, negotiated directly with Qodo’s sales team. Based on publicly available information, Enterprise pricing starts at approximately $45 per user per month, though per-seat costs likely decrease at higher volumes.

Key Enterprise-only features:

• Context engine for multi-repo awareness. Builds intelligence across multiple repositories, understanding how changes in one repo affect services in another. Critical for microservice architectures.
• Enterprise dashboard and analytics. Centralized visibility into code quality trends, review activity, and team performance across the organization.
• User-admin portal with SSO. Single sign-on through your existing identity provider with centralized access management.
• Enterprise MCP tools. Specialized tooling for Qodo agents within enterprise workflows.
• Priority support with 2-business-day SLA. Guaranteed response times for production issues.
• Deployment flexibility. SaaS, on-premises, or fully air-gapped deployment. This is the critical feature for regulated industries - finance, healthcare, defense, and government organizations that cannot send source code to external services.

Who it works for: Organizations with 50 or more developers that need self-hosted deployment, SSO, multi-repo intelligence, or compliance-grade audit controls.

Qodo Merge Pricing: Hosted vs Self-Hosted

Qodo Merge - the PR review product - has a distinct pricing consideration because of the open-source PR-Agent alternative.

Hosted Qodo Merge (Included in Plans)

When you subscribe to any Qodo plan, hosted PR review is included within the plan’s review limits. The Developer plan gives you 30 reviews per month, and the Teams plan currently offers unlimited reviews (promotion) or 20 per user per month (standard).

Self-Hosted PR-Agent (Free)

PR-Agent is Qodo’s open-source PR review engine available on GitHub. Teams can deploy it for free using Docker on their own infrastructure. The only cost is LLM API usage.

Typical LLM API costs per review:

PR Size	Estimated API Cost
Small (under 100 lines)	$0.02 - $0.05
Medium (100-500 lines)	$0.05 - $0.10
Large (500+ lines)	$0.10 - $0.25

For a 20-developer team processing 400 PRs per month:

Deployment	Monthly Cost	Annual Cost
Qodo Teams (hosted)	$600	$7,200
PR-Agent (self-hosted)	$20 - $80 (LLM API only)	$240 - $960

Self-hosted PR-Agent reduces costs by 90% or more but requires DevOps capacity to deploy, maintain, and update the tool. Teams without dedicated infrastructure engineers should use the hosted option.

Feature Comparison Across Plans

Feature	Developer (Free)	Teams ($30/user/mo)	Enterprise (Custom)
PR reviews per month	30/org	Unlimited (promo)	Unlimited
IDE/CLI credits per month	250	2,500/user	Custom
Multi-agent PR review	Yes	Yes	Yes
IDE plugin (VS Code, JetBrains)	Yes	Yes	Yes
CLI tool	Yes	Yes	Yes
Test generation	Yes	Yes	Yes
Custom review instructions	Yes	Yes	Yes
PR summaries and walkthroughs	Yes	Yes	Yes
Private support	No	Yes	Priority (2-day SLA)
Data retention	Standard	No retention	Configurable
Context engine (multi-repo)	No	No	Yes
Enterprise dashboard	No	No	Yes
SSO	No	No	Yes
On-premises deployment	No	No	Yes
Air-gapped deployment	No	No	Yes

Cost at Different Team Sizes

Understanding Qodo’s total cost requires factoring in both the per-user subscription and the credit system. The table below uses annual billing.

Team Size	Monthly Cost (Teams)	Annual Cost	Cost Per Developer Per Year
5 developers	$150	$1,800	$360
10 developers	$300	$3,600	$360
25 developers	$750	$9,000	$360
50 developers	$1,500	$18,000	$360
100 developers	$3,000	$36,000	$360

Qodo’s per-seat pricing is linear with no published volume discounts on the Teams plan. Larger organizations should negotiate directly for potential volume pricing or consider the Enterprise tier.

Free Plan Limitations in Practice

The Qodo free tier is useful for evaluation but has real constraints that affect daily workflows.

30 PR reviews per month is an organizational limit. Unlike per-user limits at competitors, Qodo’s 30 reviews are shared across every developer in the organization. A 5-person team averaging 2 PRs per developer per day would exhaust the allocation in 3 working days. This makes the free tier effectively a trial for any team larger than 2-3 people.

250 credits per month limits IDE usage. At 1 credit per standard interaction, 250 credits support roughly 10-12 interactions per working day. This is adequate for occasional test generation and code review requests but restrictive for developers who want to use AI assistance throughout their workflow. Premium model usage (5 credits for Claude Opus) reduces the effective limit to roughly 50 premium interactions per month.

No private support. Free tier users rely on community support through GitHub. If you encounter configuration issues or integration problems, resolution depends on community response time rather than a dedicated support channel.

Recent reduction from 75 to 30 PR reviews. The free tier previously offered 75 PR reviews per month, which was generous enough for small teams to use Qodo as their primary review tool. The reduction to 30 reviews signals that Qodo is tightening the free tier to drive upgrades to Teams.

When to Upgrade from Free to Teams

Upgrade when your team exceeds 30 PRs per month. This is the most common trigger. A team of 5 developers each submitting 2 PRs per day will hit the limit in the first week of the month. At that point, remaining PRs go unreviewed for the rest of the cycle - a gap that defeats the purpose of having an AI review tool.

Upgrade when you need more than 250 IDE credits. Developers who actively use Qodo Gen for test generation, code explanations, and local review will exhaust 250 credits within the first two weeks of consistent usage. The Teams plan’s 2,500 credits per user provides a 10x increase that supports daily use.

Upgrade when you need private support. For teams deploying Qodo in production workflows, community support is not sufficient. The Teams plan’s private support channel with no data retention provides the assurance that production issues get addressed promptly.

Upgrade when data retention matters. The Teams plan explicitly guarantees no data retention - Qodo does not store your source code after analysis. The free tier does not make this same guarantee, which may be a blocker for teams handling sensitive codebases.

Competitor Pricing Comparison

Pricing Overview Table

Tool	Free Tier	Paid Starting Price	Billing Model	Test Generation
Qodo	30 PRs/month, 250 credits	$30/user/month	Per user	Yes
CodeRabbit	Unlimited repos (rate-limited)	$24/user/month	Per PR creator	No
GitHub Copilot	50 premium requests	$19/user/month (Business)	Per user + overages	No
CodeAnt AI	None	$24/user/month	Per user	No
Greptile	None (14-day trial)	$30/seat/month	Per seat + overages	No
Sourcery	OSS repos only	$12/user/month	Per user	No

Qodo vs CodeRabbit Pricing

CodeRabbit is $6/user/month cheaper than Qodo Teams on annual billing ($24 vs $30). CodeRabbit’s free tier is also more generous for PR review - it offers unlimited repos with 4 PR reviews per hour instead of Qodo’s 30 per month cap.

However, Qodo bundles test generation, IDE code review, and CLI tooling alongside PR review. CodeRabbit focuses exclusively on PR review. If your team needs both a PR review tool and a test generation tool, buying them separately (CodeRabbit + a test gen tool) may cost more than Qodo’s all-in-one pricing.

For a 20-developer team on annual billing:

Tool	Monthly Cost	Annual Cost
Qodo Teams	$600	$7,200
CodeRabbit Pro	$480	$5,760
Difference	$120/month	$1,440/year

Qodo vs GitHub Copilot Pricing

GitHub Copilot Business at $19/user/month is $11/user/month cheaper than Qodo Teams. Copilot is also a broader platform - code completion, chat, agents, and code review bundled together.

Qodo’s advantages over Copilot are deeper PR analysis through its multi-agent architecture, dedicated test generation, and support for GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps (Copilot’s code review is GitHub-only). For teams already on GitHub Copilot, adding Qodo means paying for a second tool. The question is whether Qodo’s deeper review and test generation justify $30/user/month on top of an existing Copilot subscription.

For a detailed comparison, see our Qodo vs GitHub Copilot guide.

Qodo vs CodeAnt AI Pricing

CodeAnt AI offers two paid tiers - Basic at $24/user/month and Premium at $40/user/month. CodeAnt AI does not have a free tier, but its Basic plan matches CodeRabbit Pro pricing while bundling AI PR reviews, one-click auto-fixes, and 30+ language support.

CodeAnt AI’s Premium plan at $40/user/month adds SAST scanning, secret detection, IaC security, DORA metrics, and SOC 2/HIPAA audit reports. This makes it an all-in-one code quality and security platform rather than just a review tool.

For a 20-developer team:

Tool	Plan	Monthly Cost	Annual Cost	Includes
Qodo	Teams	$600	$7,200	PR review + test gen + IDE + CLI
CodeAnt AI	Basic	$480	$5,760	PR review + auto-fix
CodeAnt AI	Premium	$800	$9,600	PR review + SAST + secrets + IaC + DORA

Teams that need test generation should choose Qodo. Teams that need security scanning and compliance reporting should consider CodeAnt AI Premium. Teams that need only PR review at the lowest price should look at CodeAnt AI Basic or CodeRabbit Pro.

Qodo vs Greptile Pricing

Greptile matches Qodo’s base price at $30/seat/month but adds per-review overages of $1 each after 50 reviews per seat. For high-volume teams, Greptile’s effective cost can exceed Qodo’s significantly. Greptile has no free tier - only a 14-day trial.

Greptile’s advantage is review depth. By indexing the entire codebase, Greptile achieves an 82% bug catch rate in benchmarks versus the industry average of 40-55%. Teams that prioritize catching the maximum number of bugs may find Greptile’s premium worth paying. Teams that want test generation alongside review should choose Qodo.

Annual Cost Comparison for a 50-Developer Team

Tool	Plan	Annual Cost (50 devs)	Key Differentiator
Sourcery	Pro	$7,200	Budget AI review
CodeAnt AI	Basic	$14,400	PR review + auto-fix
CodeRabbit	Pro	$14,400	Deepest PR-only review
GitHub Copilot	Business	$11,400	All-in-one AI platform
Qodo	Teams	$18,000	PR review + test generation
Greptile	Cloud	$18,000+	Highest bug catch rate
CodeAnt AI	Premium	$24,000	Review + SAST + secrets + DORA

Qodo Teams sits at the higher end of the market at $18,000/year for 50 developers. The price is justified if your team uses the test generation and IDE/CLI tooling - capabilities that no other tool in this comparison includes. If you only need PR review, CodeRabbit Pro delivers more review features at $14,400/year.

Final Recommendation

Choose the Qodo free tier if you are a solo developer or a team of 2-3 people submitting fewer than 30 PRs per month. The free plan gives you access to the full multi-agent review architecture and test generation capabilities with enough credits for regular but not heavy IDE usage. Use it to evaluate whether Qodo’s combination of review and testing fits your workflow.

Choose Qodo Teams at $30/user/month if your team has 5 or more developers, you need consistent PR review coverage without hitting monthly limits, and you value the integrated test generation capability. The Teams plan is competitively priced when you consider that it replaces both a PR review tool and a test generation tool. Annual billing at $30/user/month (versus $38 monthly) saves 21% and is recommended for any team committing beyond a trial period.

Choose self-hosted PR-Agent if your team has DevOps capacity and wants to minimize cost. Self-hosting eliminates the per-seat subscription entirely, reducing costs to $0.02-$0.10 per review in LLM API fees. This is the most cost-effective option for teams in regulated industries that also need on-premises deployment.

Choose Qodo Enterprise if you need multi-repo context awareness, SSO, enterprise dashboards, or air-gapped deployment. Enterprise is the right tier for organizations with strict compliance requirements and 50 or more developers.

Consider alternatives if you do not need test generation and want lower per-seat costs. CodeRabbit Pro at $24/user/month and CodeAnt AI at $24-$40/user/month offer strong PR review at lower price points. GitHub Copilot Business at $19/user/month is the best value if you want code completion, chat, and basic review in one platform.

For teams transitioning from CodiumAI, see our CodiumAI to Qodo migration guide. For a broader look at AI-powered testing options, check our best AI test generation tools roundup.